Paying the cost of unsafe imports

Interesting opinion article in the Mercury News, written by professors of law at University of California - Berkely.

2 of their opinions made me react :

1. First on the FDA implementation in China :

"Several weeks ago, for example, the Food and Drug Administration opened its first office in Beijing. This is a fine idea, but how will the eight employees working at the FDA's China facility inspect even a meaningful fraction of the $321 billion worth of goods imported from that country each year?"

I can only agree.. Though this FDA move is a clear improvement in the collaboration at state levels between the US and China on the products quality and safety issues, it is only symbolic in my opinion, and won't have much concrete consequences...

2. Then, our 2 professors have an interesting proposal :

"Where U.S. regulators expect a threat to consumer protection from foreign goods and services (because, for example, foreign regulatory structures are ineffective), they should increase the penalties for dangerous products levied on domestic companies involved in the importation and sale of the goods."

This is an interesting one, and I agree that there is much to be done at a legislative level in western countries to impose stricter supply chains to local companies. However, I would add that it is important to understand the supply chain itself, and who should hold the highest liability when unsafe imports are put on western markets.

My point is that it is easy to blame it on the Importer - often a SME - when he is only repercuting the cost pressure he gets from the final distributor (big retail groups) on his own Chinese or Asian suppliers. Ultimately, the real decision makers on the quality of imported goods are often big corporate retailers, who won't deal direct with Chinese factories, and who transfer the liability and risk of importing to smaller specialists importers.

So who should pay when something goes wrong ? And, more importantly, who should pay to make sure everything goes right (by implementing for ex. systematic quality controls at the source) ?

Comments

[Cindy Clarrrk]

I think that terms & conditions should be made regarding the safety of products on global level to prevent the harms of unsafe products.

[Avelia Marshal]

I agree that there are some issues regarding the safety of products imported from China but these countries like China and Pakistan are now focusing on the quality of their products.

[Jesica Martin]

There is a recent news that Chinese Govermenrt is now considering to put some restrictions regarding use of cadmium in the products.

[David Morson]

It mainly depends on the components used in the manufacture of a product like there is a news from China using Cadmium in its products.

[Ajlouny]

Product liability is when a manufacturers negligence in designing unsafe products available to the general public have caused harm. The negligent party is held responsible for accidents, illnesses and injuries those products have caused.

[Ken Reid]

We've been writing about the China API situation for some time in Inspection Monitor and Validations Times.

Check out our web site for sample issues www.FDAINFO.com and www.FDADocuments.org

Ken